Inclusionary zoning can't work because of the exclusionary zoning policies that the system relies on, according to new research.

Emily Hamilton, a researcher at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, shares a newly published working paper online that digs into the market outcomes of inclusionary zoning. The findings are not positive.
"Policymakers should not pursue inclusionary zoning as an affordability strategy," concludes Hamilton in a post to introduce and promote the research. "Rather, policymakers who want to create an environment of housing stability for households of all incomes should pursue land use liberalization (allowing for more abundant housing supply) along with subsidies targeted to those households that need them to afford market-rate housing."
Hamilton's explanation of the findings of the new paper distinguishes between the wide varieties of inclusionary zoning programs that have been implemented in 886 jurisdictions around the United States. Mandatory inclusionary zoning, optional inclusionary zoning, inclusionary zoning incentivized by density bonuses—the value of any program varies from neighborhood to neighborhood and relies very much on the rely on the underlying exclusionary zoning that prevents developers from building.
Hamilton studied the Baltimore-Washington region, where 15 jurisdictions have mandatory inclusionary zoning policies, and eight have optional programs. "Among those with optional programs, only Alexandria, VA, and Falls Church, VA, have produced any units," according to Hamilton. "Relative to other jurisdictions with optional inclusionary zoning programs, these jurisdictions have high house prices, owing in large part to their otherwise exclusionary zoning and high demand for housing."
FULL STORY: Inclusionary Zoning Hurts More Than It Helps

New Florida Law Curbs HOA Power
The legislation seeks to cut down on ‘absurd’ citations for low-level violations.

New Tennessee Law Allows No-Cost Incentives for Affordable Housing
Local governments in the Volunteer State can now offer developers incentives like increased density, lower parking requirements, and priority permitting for affordable housing projects.

Planners’ Complicity in Excessive Traffic Deaths
Professor Wes Marshall’s provocatively-titled new book, "Killed by a Traffic Engineer," has stimulated fierce debates. Are his criticisms justified? Let’s examine the degree that traffic engineers contribute to avoidable traffic deaths.

Study: Housing Crisis is About Affordability, not Supply
New research shows that there is no overall shortage of housing units, but all U.S. metropolitan areas face a severe lack of affordable units for low-income renters.

Are Race-Based Lawsuits Affecting Community Lenders?
Shelterforce spoke with community lending leaders and experts about the current mood across the sector. What, if anything, are organizations doing to avoid becoming the next target of conservative activists?

New Park Promotes Community and Connectivity in Lewisville, Texas
The city of Lewisville just celebrated the opening of Glory Park/Parque la Gloria, helping to improve park access and the quality of life for residents.
City of Madera
City of Santa Clarita
Borough of Carlisle
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Colorado Energy Office
Pima County Community College District
City of Piedmont, CA
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.